Received: from relay4.UU.NET (relay4.UU.NET [192.48.96.14]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id LAA21008 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Sat, 13 Jan 1996 11:11:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay4.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzyiy18907; Sat, 13 Jan 1996 11:10:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA04222; Sat, 13 Jan 1996 11:07:20 -0500
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 11:07:20 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <s0f6216c.064@gwgate.stpaul.gov>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Alan Lloyd <alan.lloyd@stpaul.gov>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: O
X-Status:
>>> Chris Purdie <topher@fox.nstn.ca> 01/11/96 10:42pm >>>
>Most VCR's have an output, why not just have it pass through the VCR?
>Or did I miss an earlier post about this?
Don't recommend this for one reason: "Looping" will degrade your signal,
and especially in the CGI area, where edges are much more defined and
colors purer, it will show up. Best was the suggestion of using a PAR's
multiple outputs (presumes the ability to do SVHS or component), easier to